I don't believe that birds are government drones, but I believe something else...

    No, this bird is not writing this in an attempt to convince you, the reader, that birds are not actually government spy drones. Although that's probably something a bird capable of doing so would write, but that's not the case here. And this is a joke that could be spun in circles until it becomes a whole circular reality in which one resides. Just like life! Zoinks!

Bird ((Raven) Maybe, it could be a crow)

    This is no theory; life forms do come in, how should I say, different forms. Circular, rectangular, in the shape of a bottle or a bird. So, I believe that life comes in various forms, which makes much more sense than birds being government spy drones. I'm not saying that a circle, an abstract or rectangular shape of a building, or a plastic bottle is specifically life, but somehow it is. A poor abstract circle doesn't exist if there's nothing to imagine it into existence, and that something exists precisely before it, and its entire existence depends on the pre-existence of the other. Are you afraid little circle?

    And a bird is inherently explained as life, which automatically excludes it from being an artificial government spy drone. And I believe that's true for most birds. Although, I don't exclude the possibility that some government created artificial birds to be their spies; but then those aren't actually birds, but specialized military intelligence weapons.

    I think this raises the issue of moral and ethical debate on the national territorialization of animals and the regulation of animal movement. This is something that would be particularly difficult to determine with birds, like pigeons, so it is indeed a question worth discussing for policymakers.

    For example, it's much easier to determine this with cows. They are land animals that are domesticated, and their reproduction occurs in completely controlled conditions. Then I know where the cow comes from. We can also track dogs easily, and maybe even the most complex animal - a human. They have passports, their place of origin is known, they're mostly in the country or place that their passport belongs to, and you don't think about them. For heaven's sake, I don't think about where the French are all day, most of them are probably in France, and the rest are traveling somewhere.

    In general, birds don't follow those rules, so is it even possible to integrate them into the system, like other forms of life?

    If so, then I believe that birds should also be brought into the horizontal, that they should be integrated into the socio-economic and political system, along with all the other members of our society, equal before God, the tax collector, and the judiciary. But what kind of society does that create then? Oh no, yucky, it doesn't create this modern capitalist society, oh no, I don't want that!

    I mean, who knows, maybe that's an indicator that birds, unlike cows, wouldn't adequately respect bureaucratic and systemic procedures?

    But chickens prove the opposite - that birds can respect bureaucratic and systemic procedures. As they became increasingly integrated into the system over time, they became four times larger physically than they were less than 100 years ago, and today there are four times more of them in the world than humans! So it seems that the ones who are actually at a loss are not people refusing to integrate certain birds, but simply the birds themselves who refuse to see the benefits of integration into the human system and civilization.

    So, there's a greater chance that the bird you meet on the street is not a government spy drone but an ignorant form of life.

Gavran Gusti

Ne vjerujem da su ptice dronovi Vlade, već vjerujem u nešto smislenije...

    Ne, ovo ne piše ova ptica u namjeri da vas kao čitaoca/teljku razuvjeri da ptice zapravo nisu vještački špijunski dronovi Vlade. Iako je to vjerovatno nešto što bi ptica koja bi mogla to da uradi i napisala, ali to sada stvarno nije slučaj. Ovo je šala koja bi mogla da se vrti u krug dok ne postane čitava jedna cirkularna realnost u kojoj se obitava. Kao i život! Zoinks!

Ptica ((Gavran)Valjda, možda je i vrana)

    Ovo nije nikakva teorija, oblici života dolaze, pa, kako da kažem, u različitim oblicima. Kružnim, pravougaonim, u obliku boce ili ptice. Dakle, vjerujem da život dolazi u raznim oblicima, što je mnogo smislenije nego da su ptice špijunski dronovi Vlade. I ne kažem da je neki krug, apstraktni ili pravougaonik zgrada ili plastična boca konkretno život, ali nekako i jeste. Neki jadni apstraktni krug ne postoji ukoliko ne postoji nešto da ga zamisli u postojanju, a to nešto postoji upravo prije njega i njegova čitava egzistencija zavisi od pred-egzistencije ove druge. Bojiš li se kruže mali?

    A ptica je već samoobjašnjivo život, što je, po meni, automatski isključuje iz toga da bude vještački špijunski dron Vlade. I to smatram da je tačno za većinu ptica, iako ne isključujem mogućnost da je neka Vlada kreirala vještačke ptice da im budu špijuni; ali to onda nisu ptice već specijalizovana vojno-obavještajna oružja. 

    Mislim da bi ovo povelu u moralnu i etičku debatu nacionalne teritorijalizacije životinja i pitanje regulisanja kretanja životinja. To je nešto što bi pogotovo teško bilo utvrditi sa pticama, poput na primjer golubova, pa je zaista pitanje njihovog legitimnog boravka na određenoj teritoriji nešto što je  vrijedno diskusije za kreatore javnih politika. 

    Za krave se na primjer to mnogo lakše utvrdđuje. To su kopnene životinje koje su pripitomljene i čija se reprodukcija sprovodi u skroz kontrolisanim uslovima. Onda znam odakle je krava. Pse isto lako možemo ispratiti, pa čak i možda najkompleksniju životinju - čovjeka. Ima pasoš, zna se odakle dolazi, uglavnom je tamo u državi ili mjestu čiji ima pasoš i ne razmišljaš o njemu. Pa pobogu ne razmišljam gdje su Francuzi po cijeli dan, vjerovatno je većina njih u Francuskoj, a ostali negdje putuju. 

    Uglavnom, kod ptica ne važe ta pravila, pa da li ih je onda moguće uopšte integrisati u sistem, kao neke druge oblike života? 

    Ako je tako, onda vjerujem da bi i ptice trebalo uvesti u horizontalu, da bi ih trebalo integrisati u socio-ekonomski i politički sistem, sa svim ostalim članovima našeg društva, jednakim pred bogom, poreskim upravnikom i pravosudnim organima. Ali kakvo se društvo dobija onda? Oh, ne, fuj, ne dobija se ovo moderno kapitalističko društvo, joj, ne, fuj, neću to! 

    Mislim ko zna, možda je i to indikator da ptice za razliku od krava ne bi adekvatno poštovale birokratske i sistemske procedure? 

    Ali kokoške su dokaz za upravo suprotno od toga - da ptice mogu poštovati birokratske i sistemske procedure. Kako su vremenom postajale sve više integrisane u sistem, postale su četiri puta fizički veće nego što su bile prije manje od 100 godina, a danas ih na svijetu ima 4 (četiri) puta više nego ljudi! Tako da, čini se, onaj ko je zapravo na gubitku tu nisu ljudi odbijanjem da integrišu određene ptice, već jednostavno same ptice koje odbijaju da vide benefite integracije u čovječantski sistem i civilizaciju. 

    Tako da, veća je šansa da ptica koju sretnete na ulici nije špijunski dron Vlade, već jedan ignorantni oblik života.

Gavran Gusti