I don't believe that birds are government drones, but I believe something else...

    No, this bird is not writing this in an attempt to convince you, the reader, that birds are not actually government spy drones. Although that's probably something a bird capable of doing so would write, but that's not the case here. And this is a joke that could be spun in circles until it becomes a whole circular reality in which one resides. Just like life! Zoinks!

Bird ((Raven) Maybe, it could be a crow)

    This is no theory; life forms do come in, how should I say, different forms. Circular, rectangular, in the shape of a bottle or a bird. So, I believe that life comes in various forms, which makes much more sense than birds being government spy drones. I'm not saying that a circle, an abstract or rectangular shape of a building, or a plastic bottle is specifically life, but somehow it is. A poor abstract circle doesn't exist if there's nothing to imagine it into existence, and that something exists precisely before it, and its entire existence depends on the pre-existence of the other. Are you afraid little circle?

    And a bird is inherently explained as life, which automatically excludes it from being an artificial government spy drone. And I believe that's true for most birds. Although, I don't exclude the possibility that some government created artificial birds to be their spies; but then those aren't actually birds, but specialized military intelligence weapons.

    I think this raises the issue of moral and ethical debate on the national territorialization of animals and the regulation of animal movement. This is something that would be particularly difficult to determine with birds, like pigeons, so it is indeed a question worth discussing for policymakers.

    For example, it's much easier to determine this with cows. They are land animals that are domesticated, and their reproduction occurs in completely controlled conditions. Then I know where the cow comes from. We can also track dogs easily, and maybe even the most complex animal - a human. They have passports, their place of origin is known, they're mostly in the country or place that their passport belongs to, and you don't think about them. For heaven's sake, I don't think about where the French are all day, most of them are probably in France, and the rest are traveling somewhere.

    In general, birds don't follow those rules, so is it even possible to integrate them into the system, like other forms of life?

    If so, then I believe that birds should also be brought into the horizontal, that they should be integrated into the socio-economic and political system, along with all the other members of our society, equal before God, the tax collector, and the judiciary. But what kind of society does that create then? Oh no, yucky, it doesn't create this modern capitalist society, oh no, I don't want that!

    I mean, who knows, maybe that's an indicator that birds, unlike cows, wouldn't adequately respect bureaucratic and systemic procedures?

    But chickens prove the opposite - that birds can respect bureaucratic and systemic procedures. As they became increasingly integrated into the system over time, they became four times larger physically than they were less than 100 years ago, and today there are four times more of them in the world than humans! So it seems that the ones who are actually at a loss are not people refusing to integrate certain birds, but simply the birds themselves who refuse to see the benefits of integration into the human system and civilization.

    So, there's a greater chance that the bird you meet on the street is not a government spy drone but an ignorant form of life.

Gavran Gusti